“We do need to marry-up that genomics information with the epidemiological information.“So the CCTV footage, the interviews, to really understand how transmission might have occurred.“We’re confident at the moment it’s not been picked up in the community but from one of the residents in the hotel.”The worker doesn’t appear to have spread the virus with 16 of the man’s 17 social and household contacts testing negative. The final result is expected on Friday.Prof Sutton maintained there was no apparent breach of infection prevention and control protocols, or PPE, but health officials would re-examine what took place at Grand Hyatt Hotel.
He said droplet spread was managed using PPE and 1.5m social distancing but airborne spread, through aerosolised particles, could move even further than that.“Airborne transmission is probably more likely with variants of concern, it has always been a possibility, but it’s going to be a bigger risk factor going forward,” Prof Sutton said.Premier Daniel Andrews said authorities had “spared not effort” to try and run the outbreak into the ground.
“It’s very clear the risk we face now is very different to what is was a month ago or six months ago,” Mr Andrews said.Victoria has recorded no new local cases since the man tested positive from more than 22,500 tests.The health department confirmed three new cases were recorded on Friday morning, all in returned travellers in hotel quarantine.
jack.paynter@news.com.au
Powered by WPeMatico