Detail ignored in Drake’s post-sex act

OSTN Staff

This past week, the internet has been laughing at Drake after rumours that he pours hot sauce into his used condoms to kill his sperm surfaced. I’m not often one to defend this man — particularly after those troubling friendships with very young females — but this time the internet is wrong.By way of celebrity gossip Instagram, @toomuchhottea, an IG model shared her story after she met up with the rapper for consensual sexy times.“ … they went back to his hotel,” goes the IG post. “They smoked weed for a bit, and he asked if she wanted to have sex. She said he was very intent on ensuring things were consensual. “ … eventually [he] came inside the condom. Immediately after, he went back into the bathroom to dispose of it.“She fished the condom out of the trash, untied it, and put the opening end into her v*gina … She said it felt like pouring hot lava into her p*ssy.“She screamed, and Drake ran into the bathroom. He admitted that he poured a packet of hot sauce in the condom to kill the sperm. Now the Instagram model is threatening to sue Drake.”The post calls this hot sauce act “CRAZY” in capital letters, but it’s obviously not. Drake had normal, consensual sex with an adult woman, then he disposed of the condom. That should be the end of the story. The only reason it’s not is because this woman decided to sperm-jack Drake. THAT is the crazy part. The only thing crazier than that is the fact that she’s now reportedly trying to sue him — despite admitting what she was trying to do, making the whole thing her fault.By her story alone, she confirmed that Drake is actually pretty sensible for pouring hot sauce into his used condoms.Drake seems to have responded with an Instagram post, shared with the cryptic caption: “You can have your 15 minutes of fame … I’ll take the other 23 hours and 45 mins”.Let me just end with this thought: if a man removes his condom during sex without the consent of his sexual partner, commonly known as ‘stealthing’, that is a sex crime. As it should be.So why do we consider it any differently if a woman takes intentional measures to ensure pregnancy — like going off the pill or trying to pour the contents of a used condom into her vagina — without the consent of her sexual partner?

Powered by WPeMatico