ACLU Agrees With Trump – Gag Order Is Unconstitutional Assault On The First Amendment

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a brief on Wednesday urging U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan to reconsider a gag order on former President Donald Trump in his “election interference” case.

It is a somewhat shocking move considering the group had been a consistent thorn in Trump’s side during his presidency.

The ACLU insists that Chutkan’s order is too broad, too vague, and a violation of the First Amendment.

Still, they claim Trump “has said many things” that are “patently false and has caused great harm to countless individuals.”

“But Trump retains a First Amendment right to speak, and the rest of us retain a right to hear what he has to say,” the brief reads.

“Trump retains a First Amendment right to speak, and the rest of us retain a right to hear what he has to say.”

The ACLU filed a court document blasting Judge Tanya Chutkan’s gag order as unconstitutionally vague.

You know something is absurd when the Left loses the ACLU. pic.twitter.com/r05Cahu2h9

— Daniel Baldwin (@baldwin_daniel_) October 25, 2023

RELATED: Trump Hints He’ll Violate Gag Order: ‘I Am Willing To Go To Jail’ To Save America

ACLU Argues Against Trump Gag Order

Gag orders in general, by their very nature, are a violation of free speech rights and are issued against a defendant at the risk of violating a right to a presumption of innocence.

“The First Amendment does not authorize the Court to impose a judicial gag order on Defendant merely because third parties who hear his public statements may behave badly of their own accord,” the ACLU writes.

Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the ACLU, argued in a statement that “if we allow (Trump’s) free speech rights to be abridged, we know that other unpopular voices — even ones we agree with — will also be silenced.”

“As much as we disagreed with Donald Trump’s policies, everyone is entitled to the same First Amendment protection against gag orders that are too broad and too vague,” Romero said.

Bet y’all never saw THIS coming!!!

ACLU actually did something right…

They’ve sided with Trump on the BS gag order that was placed on him!!

You know it was bad if the ACLU has Trump’s back… THEY ABSOLUTELY HATE HIM!!!

Trump2024 pic.twitter.com/KySm2ohEEV

— SaltyGoat (@SaltyGoat17) October 26, 2023

Chutkan initially implemented the gag order while pointing to Trump’s use of the word “thug” to describe Special Counsel Jack Smith and his prosecutorial team in the so-called ‘election interference’ case.

Smith reiterated his desire to squash Trump’s First Amendment rights on Thursday, asking the judge to reimplement the gag order after a temporary stay claiming the former President is “threatening” witnesses.

NEW: In a breathless, 32-page motion filed yesterday, Special Counsel Jack Smith asks Judge Chutkan to lift her own stay on gag order against Trump AND to modify his conditions of release to set up a tighter contempt trap against Trump.

These people are, indeed, deranged. pic.twitter.com/jeQ7jOdCEy

— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) October 26, 2023

RELATED: Senator J.D. Vance: Judge’s Gag Order On Trump An Assault On The First Amendment

Trump Said He’s Willing To Go To Jail

The ACLU’s comments on the Trump gag order are reminiscent of those made by Senator J.D. Vance (R-OH) who called Chutkan’s decision “disgraceful.”

“Just a direct assault on the First Amendment,” Vance wrote in an X social media post. “Disgraceful. Something that should be appealed as quickly as possible all the way to the Supreme Court.”

The ACLU seemingly concurred and even hinted that the gag order would interfere in the 2024 presidential election, which is exactly what the Biden administration is hoping for.

“Defendant’s ability to speak publicly about the substance of the prosecution, even including potential witnesses and testimony, is in many ways inextricable from the 2024 presidential campaign in which he is a declared candidate,” they wrote.

ACLU sides with Trump over Jan. 6 criminal case gag order

The ACLU contends the gag order doesn’t clearly define “targeting” and could prevent Trump from discussing 2024 presidential campaign issues that voters have a right to hear. https://t.co/qzOJbRjCql

— Lisa ‘Mockingjay’ Newens (@PerfumeFlogger) October 25, 2023

Trump, the leading contender for the GOP nomination for president, has contended that the gag order and the trial itself are forms of election interference.

And, he has suggested, if he has to violate the terms in order to communicate with the American people, he will. No matter the risks.

“What they don’t understand is that I am willing to go to jail if that’s what it takes for our country to win and become a democracy again,” Trump said.

“I am willing to go to JAIL if that’s what it takes for our country to win and become a DEMOCRACY again.” — President Trump in Clive, Iowa pic.twitter.com/HjYHC6C7mq

— RSBN (@RSBNetwork) October 16, 2023

Judges can threaten gag order violators with fines or jail time, and Chutkan hinted at possible “sanctions” if Trump were to violate any such order.

Now is the time to support and share the sources you trust.
The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites.”

The post ACLU Agrees With Trump – Gag Order Is Unconstitutional Assault On The First Amendment appeared first on The Political Insider.