The DOJ’s top election crimes official stepped down hours after AG Barr authorized investigations into voter fraud in violation of department policy

• The DOJ’s top election crimes official resigned Monday after Attorney General William Barr authorized investigations into election fraud in violation of department policy, despite a lack of evidence, The New York Times reported.
• Barr said federal prosecutors could investigate any “substantial allegations” of election-related fraud before states have certified results, contradicting longstanding DOJ guidelines meant to prevent the department from interfering with elections.
• The attorney general’s decision comes as President Donald Trump refuses to concede the election and he and his loyalists make unfounded allegations of widespread voter fraud and election-rigging.
• Barr’s decision drew swift condemnation from legal experts and former DOJ officials who said the move undermined the independence of the agency.
• Barr has repeatedly backed Trump’s baseless claims of voter fraud and recently rolled back DOJ rules aimed at preserving political neutrality.
• Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.

The Justice Department’s top official in charge of investigating election crimes resigned Monday after Attorney General William Barr released a memo ignoring longstanding policy meant to prevent the DOJ from interfering in elections.

Richard Pilger, the director of the Department of Justice’s elections crime branch, stepped down just hours after Barr sent a memo to federal prosecutors authorizing them to open investigations into “substantial allegations” of potential election fraud before states have certified their results, which violates department policy, The New York Times reported. There is little evidence to back up the claims of fraud.

“Having familiarized myself with the new policy and its ramifications I must regretfully resign from my role as director of the Election Crimes Branch,” Pilger wrote in an email to colleagues, according to The Times.

The report said Pilger, who oversaw the DOJ’s investigations into potential voter fraud, would step into a “nonsupervisory” role.

Monday wasn’t the first time Barr sidestepped department guidance against interfering in elections. Last month, he ordered the DOJ to roll back another decades-old election non-interference policy that prevented prosecutors from taking steps that could influence an election.

And beginning in June, he repeatedly floated the bogus theory that hostile foreign powers could interfere in the election by mass-producing counterfeit ballots and mailing them to US voters. Barr told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer in September that “logic” proved his argument before admitting that he had no evidence to back it up.

Barr’s memo on Monday drew swift backlash from election law experts and DOJ veterans who defended Pilger’s reputation and excoriated the attorney general’s decision as politically motivated.

“Given the kinds of unsupported claims Barr has made about election fraud before, I am concerned about his potential meddling in the electoral process for political reasons,” Rick Hasen, an election law and administration expert at the University of California at Irvine, told Business Insider.

“Richard Pilger is a respected apolitical attorney who has been a federal corruption prosecutor for decades,” Noah Bookbinder, a former DOJ corruption crimes prosecutor and director of the nonprofit Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, tweeted Monday, adding: “His resigning in protest makes clear to me that something very wrong indeed is happening here.”

Barr said that nothing in his memo “should be taken as any indication that the department has concluded that voting irregulation have impacted the outcome of any election” and that “specious, speculative, fanciful or far-fetched claims should not be the basis for initiating federal inquiries,” according to The Wall Street Journal.

Nonetheless, Stephen Vladeck, a law professor at the University of Texas, told The New York Times that Barr’s decision to reverse DOJ’s policies on election noninterference “when there is no such evidence — and when the president’s clear strategy is to delegitimize the results of a proper election — is one of the more problematic acts of any attorney general in my lifetime.”